Cerca nel blog
Avvocato per Stranieri è un blog curato dall’Avv. Fabio Loscerbo, Avvocato Cassazionista, dedicato al diritto dell’immigrazione. L’Avv. Loscerbo è iscritto nel Registro dei rappresentanti di interessi della Camera dei deputati in materia di Immigrazione ed è lobbista registrato presso il Registro per la Trasparenza dell’Unione europea in materia di Migrazione e Asilo. Il blog propone approfondimenti, novità normative e giurisprudenziali e contenuti pratici
Post
New on TikTok: العنوان: المحكمة تمنح الحماية لكن الإقامة تُرفض بسبب إشارة SISماذا يحدث عندما تمنح المحكمة الحماية الدولية لكن سلطات الهجرة ترفض تصريح الإقامة بسبب إشارة SIS؟ في هذه الحلقة أشرح لماذا تثير قضية بريشيا أسئلة قانونية مهمة حول شنغن وفعالية حماية الحقوق.
- Ottieni link
- X
- Altre app
New on TikTok: Student Residence Permit: One Missed Appointment Is Not Enough to Deny Renewal A missed immigration appointment does not automatically mean abandoning a residence permit application. An important 2026 ruling of the Regional Administrative Court of Emilia-Romagna held that proportionality and individual circumstances matter, annulling a denial of renewal for study purposes. A significant decision for immigration law.
- Ottieni link
- X
- Altre app
Italia: un tribunal concede el permiso de residencia tras la negativa de la policía gracias al trabajo y la integración
- Ottieni link
- X
- Altre app
العنوان: إيطاليا: محكمة تلغي رفض تجديد تصريح الإقامة القائم على خلل إداري شكلي
- Ottieni link
- X
- Altre app
New on TikTok: Protection Granted by the Court, but Residence Permit Denied بسبب SIS Alert: When a Judicial Decision Collides with the Schengen System Welcome to a new episode of the podcast Immigration Law. I am attorney Fabio Loscerbo. Today I want to discuss a very important issue, one that reveals a deep tension between judicial protection and administrative power: what happens when a court recognizes a person’s right to international protection, but the police immigration authority still refuses to issue the residence permit because of an alert in the Schengen Information System, the SIS? A recent judgment of the Regional Administrative Court of Brescia, published on April 23, 2026, in case number 1524 of 2025, addresses precisely this issue. The case began with a decree of the Court of Brescia recognizing the applicant’s right to subsidiary protection. A final judicial ruling. Yet, during the enforcement phase, the Questura denied the residence permit, relying on a Schengen SIS alert for refusal of entry, a signal that had even been confirmed after the court’s decree. This raises a fundamental legal question: can a European administrative alert effectively neutralize the effects of a final judicial decision? This case shows that the real issue is not only obtaining recognition of protection, but ensuring that protection is effective. Because a right recognized on paper, but impossible to implement, risks becoming merely theoretical. The Administrative Court declared the enforcement proceedings inadmissible for procedural reasons, but the legal question remains open: what is the relationship between a final court judgment, the powers of immigration authorities, and the legal effects of an SIS alert? And this is why the case matters. It forces us to reflect on the relationship between judicial sovereignty, Schengen cooperation, and effective protection of fundamental rights. In immigration law, the real challenge is often not winning the case, but making the decision actually work. This is an issue we will continue to follow, because cases like this shape the real evolution of immigration law. Thank you for listening to this episode of Immigration Law. See you next time.
- Ottieni link
- X
- Altre app